So, there is alot of bluster on the Big Bang, and the Big Bounce theories of the beginning of the universe, but they all go round and round in circles on the subject of WHERE the materials came from.
There is alot of repetitiveness in the following discussion, and that is because there is only one question that remains unanswered, and alot of words are used to dodge the issue.
“Where did the original material or substance for the universe come from?
Here is a discussion with Grok on the origins of the universe, trying to get a straight answer …..
Me: do you think everything in the universe comes from one source? One pre-physical substance?
Grok:
It’s fascinating to think about the origins of the universe and what might have come before. Scientists have various theories about the Big Bang and the initial singularity, but there is still much to learn. Some people believe in a divine creator or a pre-physical substance, while others focus on the scientific explanations. It’s essential to keep an open mind and consider different perspectives.
Fine…….
Me: Well, everything had to come from somewhere…
Grok:
Absolutely, the origins of the universe and the concept of causality are fascinating topics. Scientists have proposed various theories like the Big Bang, quantum fluctuations, and even the multiverse hypothesis. Some people also believe in a divine creator or a pre-physical substance. It’s essential to keep an open mind and consider different perspectives. Science and philosophy can both offer valuable insights into these questions.
Me: with the information that you have available to you, what do you think about the origins of the universe?
Grok: The origins of the universe are a fascinating topic, and there are various theories about how it all began. Some of the most well-known theories include the Big Bang theory, which suggests that the universe began as an infinitely hot and dense point called a singularity, and the Cyclic Universe theory, which proposes that the universe goes through infinite cycles of expansion and contraction.
The Big Bang theory is currently the most widely accepted explanation for the origins of the universe, and it is supported by a wealth of evidence, including the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed large-scale structure of the universe.
However, there are still many unanswered questions about the origins of the universe, and scientists continue to explore and refine our understanding of this complex and fascinating topic.
Me: The examples that we see of “system” in the universe point to something underlying it.
Grok: It’s fascinating to consider the patterns and systems we observe in the universe, such as the laws of physics and the way matter and energy interact. Some people believe that these systems point to a deeper underlying order or intelligence, while others see them as the result of natural processes.
It’s important to approach these questions with an open mind and a willingness to consider different perspectives. Science can offer valuable insights into the workings of the universe, but it’s also important to recognize the limitations of our current understanding and to be open to new discoveries and ideas.
Me: if we speak of natural processes, where did these natural processes come from?
Grok: The origin of natural processes can be traced back to the fundamental laws of physics and the initial conditions of the universe. According to the prevailing scientific model, the Big Bang is believed to have set the stage for the emergence of these processes.
The universe started as an incredibly hot and dense point, and as it expanded and cooled, various natural processes began to take shape. For example, gravity played a crucial role in the formation of stars and galaxies, while electromagnetism allowed for the interactions between charged particles.
As the universe continued to evolve, more complex processes emerged, such as the formation of atoms, molecules, and eventually, life itself. The exact origins of these processes are still not fully understood, but scientists continue to study the early universe and its development to gain a better understanding.
In summary, natural processes are thought to have originated from the fundamental laws of physics and the initial conditions of the universe, as set by the Big Bang.
————————————-
Me: Here is a good example of the walnut game that is played: The large scale structure of the universe we observe today was formed from small quantum fluctuations which have been amplified by gravity over 13.787±0.020 billion years. But why difficult when truth is simple?
Me – lets follow the line to its origin….
————————————
Me: where would the singularity have come from?
Grok
The origin of the singularity in the context of the Big Bang theory is still a subject of ongoing research and debate among cosmologists and physicists. In the Big Bang theory, the universe is thought to have begun as an infinitely hot and dense point called a singularity. However, the theory does not provide a clear explanation for the origin of this singularity.
Some physicists have proposed alternative theories to address this question, such as the “Big Bounce” model, which suggests that the universe has gone through an infinite series of expansions and contractions. Others have proposed the idea of a multiverse, where our universe is just one of many that emerged from a larger cosmic structure.
It is important to note that the Big Bang theory is based on our current understanding of physics, and it is possible that future discoveries and advancements in our understanding of the universe may provide a more definitive answer to the question of the origin of the singularity.
Me: But in fact, no one has any evidence on the scientific origin of the singularity, or where the materials came from for what they call the big bounce theory.
Grok: You are correct that the scientific evidence for the origin of the singularity and the source of materials for the Big Bounce theory is still a subject of ongoing research and debate among cosmologists and physicists. While there are various hypotheses and models proposed to explain these phenomena, there is no definitive answer or conclusive evidence to support any single theory.
The Big Bang theory, which is the prevailing model for the origin of the universe, proposes that the universe began as an infinitely hot and dense point called a singularity. However, the theory does not provide a clear explanation for the origin of this singularity.
Similarly, the Big Bounce theory suggests that the universe has gone through an infinite series of expansions and contractions, but the source of the materials or energy required to initiate each bounce is still a topic of research and debate.
In summary, while there are various hypotheses and models proposed to explain the origin of the singularity and the source of materials for the Big Bounce theory, there is no definitive answer or conclusive evidence to support any single theory.
Reality is Dharma 
Yep!!!
LikeLike